Doctor-designed protocols
Every agent runs doctor-designed, medically vetted protocols with defined actions, limits, and review points — never generic, autonomous decision-making.
Compliance and trust
Every Cura42 agent runs doctor-designed, medically-vetted protocols, reads only consent-cleared context from the longitudinal record, acts on routine follow-up work between visits, escalates risk-bearing decisions to a named reviewer, and logs every action for review. Governance isn't a policy page here — it's how the agents work.
Posture
We separate what's certified from what's ready, and never claim more than we can prove on request.
Every agent runs doctor-designed, medically vetted protocols with defined actions, limits, and review points — never generic, autonomous decision-making.
Cura42 uses HL7/FHIR-ready architecture and FHIR-compatible exchange so the longitudinal record can be assembled across systems, with certification claims made only against formal evidence.
Security validation is available on request, and we separate what is certified from what is ready rather than overstating either.
The agent acts on routine follow-up work and stops at the line — clinical judgment and risk-bearing decisions are handed to a named reviewer before anything reaches the patient.
Role-based access, reviewer decisions, handoff status, and every agent action are logged line by line for operational audit trails — so automation stays defensible.
The agent follows a patient across visits without ever exceeding consent: it reads the longitudinal record only where the patient has cleared it, so continuity never comes at the cost of privacy.
How a governed agent operates
Care breaks in the gaps between appointments — missed follow-ups, lapsed adherence, unclosed referrals. A supervised agent works those gaps so patients don't fall through them, and hands clinical judgment to a human before anything reaches the patient.
The agent follows a patient across visits without ever exceeding consent: it sees the longitudinal record only where the patient has cleared it, so continuity never comes at the cost of privacy.
Between-visit work — follow-up outreach, adherence check-ins, referral and result tracking — runs on medically-vetted protocols authored by clinicians, not improvised by a general model.
Clinical judgment and risk-bearing decisions are handed to a named reviewer before anything reaches the patient. Reviewer decisions, handoff status, and agent actions are recorded for operational audit trails.
Claims guardrail
Certifications and validated results are shown only with formal evidence; everything else is described as readiness, not a finished claim.
Governance and revenue
For a hospital or payer, compliance is a P&L line: audit exposure, breach cost, regulatory risk, and the payer trust that contracts depend on. Governed agents let you recapture the revenue that leaks between visits without taking on that risk.
No-shows, dropped follow-ups, and missed RPM/CCM check-ins are recoverable, billable encounters. A supervised agent works the gap and recaptures them — and because every action is logged and consent-bound, the recovery is defensible, not a compliance liability.
Audit-trail readiness and consent-aware data use turn compliance review from a recurring scramble into a query. Supervised escalation keeps clinical judgment with humans, limiting the clinical-risk exposure that drives breach cost and regulatory penalty.
Consent-aware automation protects payer and patient trust — and the contracts attached to it. The Patient Care Journey Audit maps which between-visit workflows can be automated without adding regulatory or revenue risk.
Care journey audit
The Patient Care Journey Audit maps your data readiness, consent boundaries, and human-review checkpoints — so the first agent you ship recovers revenue that leaks between visits and stays defensible, line by line.